The government can take various measures to stop or punish violations. For example, it can impose an order subject to a penalty for non-compliance, which obliges you to stop the violation on penalty of a financial penalty. In the case of an administrative coercive measure, the government intervenes itself to stop the violation, often at your expense. In addition, an administrative fine may be imposed as a punishment. A penalty order or administrative coercive measure is primarily intended to stop the violation, while a fine is imposed as a punishment.

An intention to enforce is a written notification from the government that it intends to take enforcement measures. You can respond within the specified period by submitting your opinion.

You can object to an order subject to a penalty, administrative coercion decision or fine within six weeks to the administrative body that made the decision. If the objection is rejected, you can then lodge an appeal with the administrative court. After that, there is still the possibility of appealing to the Administrative Law Division of the Council of State.

Yes, you can. If you suspect that someone is committing an offence, you can submit a request for enforcement. Only stakeholder parties can make such a request. The request must be specific and supported by evidence.

Government agencies have a legal principle of enforcement. This means that they are obliged to take action when violations are detected, unless there are compelling reasons not to do so. This prevents arbitrariness and ensures consistent supervision. Reasons for refraining from enforcement may be that it is disproportionate or that there is a prospect of legalising the violation, for example through a licence.